“The Kirtland Safety Society,” Church History Topics
“The Kirtland Safety Society”
The Kirtland Safety Society
In the fall of 1836, Joseph Smith and other Church leaders decided to found a bank in Kirtland, Ohio. The Saints in Kirtland, like the people of many smaller American communities of the time, wanted a bank of their own. In an economy based on farming, where people’s assets were mostly tied up in land, local banks not only gave needed loans but could also circulate their own notes as money to promote the exchange of goods and services, thereby expanding the local economy. For the early Saints, the goal of economic growth also had religious purposes: to expand the city as a gathering place for converts, to help Saints in Missouri who had been driven from their homes, to spread the gospel, and ultimately to establish Zion.
In October 1836, the Saints began collecting funds from stockholders to open the Kirtland Safety Society Bank, which was officially established on November 2, with Sidney Rigdon and Joseph Smith both serving as officers.1 That winter, however, the state legislature did not issue a banking charter for the Kirtland Safety Society or any other new bank. In January, the society’s directors adjusted their plans to operate without a state charter, as some other financial institutions did, given the difficulty of securing a vote by the legislature to obtain a charter.2
The Kirtland Safety Society faced a variety of challenges, however, and struggled for months before ceasing operations by August 1837.3 Many Saints incurred financial setbacks as a result, particularly Joseph Smith, whose losses were substantial. The period became a trial of faith for many members of the Church. The society’s difficulties, combined with more general economic challenges, sparked dissension within the Church and led to a significant migration of faithful Saints to Missouri.
Reasons for the Society’s Failure
Multiple factors contributed to the Kirtland Safety Society’s struggles. Many Church members looked to shortcomings within their community, blaming Church leaders for failing to anticipate problems, individuals for engaging in land speculation and overspending, or Church membership in general for not adequately supporting the society. Not all the possible contributing factors, however, were in the Saints’ control. Outside opposition, often fueled by prejudice against the Saints, also played a role in undermining the society.4
The timing of the society’s founding was also unfortunate, coming just prior to a broader financial crisis known in the United States as the Panic of 1837. The Saints’ economic efforts did not take place in a vacuum; they were dependent on the larger American economy, which at the time was greatly influenced by British fiscal policy. Higher interest rates in Britain, combined with policy changes in the United States that disrupted land sales and put pressure on the nation’s developing banking system, led to an extended economic depression in the United States.5 Land values and crop prices plummeted, leading banks, businesses, and even many U.S. states to declare bankruptcy over the next few years.
Legal and Political Context
Long before the financial panic of 1837, there were heated debates over how tightly the American government should control banking and currency. Because people on the frontier needed some medium of exchange, they often relied on notes issued by local banks, companies, or other institutions rather than on gold, silver, or the limited supply of government-issued currency. Hard-money advocates tended to oppose the spread of such practices and wanted banking and currency tightly regulated and backed by gold. Soft-money advocates preferred easier access to banking and a wide circulation of public and private currencies to encourage economic development. When the Kirtland Safety Society issued its own notes, it was in line with the position held by soft-money advocates but in conflict with an 1816 state statute established by hard-money advocates.6 Though prosecutions under the 1816 law were rare, both Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon were tried and fined over the Kirtland Safety Society’s decision to circulate banking notes.7
Saints’ Responses
Economic conditions in 1837 were hard on the Saints in Kirtland.8 A collapse in land prices was a struggle for a community where many still owed money on farms and homes they had purchased for far more than they were worth in 1837. The downturn was particularly difficult for Kirtland Saints to weather because of their previous optimism about the city’s economic future, which had been bolstered by statements from Joseph Smith and other Church leaders.9 That general optimism had included a sense that the Kirtland Safety Society would succeed if the Saints were faithful.10 When the year brought economic pain instead of prosperity, some Saints experienced a crisis of faith.
Some Latter-day Saints became outspoken critics of Joseph Smith during the period. A faction led by Warren Parrish rejected Joseph’s leadership altogether and created a short-lived splinter church. Others, like Apostle Parley P. Pratt, expressed feelings of betrayal and disappointment in the short term but soon returned to fellowship. Most Kirtland Saints remained faithful but saw friends dissent and ultimately leave the Church.11
In 1838, in the face of continued dissension, threats of violence, and economic and legal challenges, members of the First Presidency moved to Missouri, followed by many of the Kirtland Saints.12 Even after Joseph Smith left Ohio, work to settle his financial affairs there was not neglected. Oliver Granger, who had assumed responsibility for many of Joseph Smith’s Kirtland financial assets, continued to work on settling his financial affairs and paying remaining debts in the area until Granger’s death in 1841, when Reuben McBride assumed these financial responsibilities.13